Argumentation, Planning and Ethical Reasoning

Computational models of argumentation can facilitate systems which integrate planning and ethical reasoning components, e.g. case-based, and systems which provide rationale for generated plans and courses of action. Such models can be of use for various input and output parameters in the interfaces of planning and ethical reasoning components, in addition to being of use for expressing the resultant rationales of generated plans and courses of action.

Plan rationales are discussed in Rationale in Planning: Causality, Dependencies, and Decisions by Stephen T. Polyak and Austin Tate. Another topic pertinent to argumentation and planning, arguing about plans, is discussed in Arguing about Plans: Plan Representation and Reasoning for Mixed-initiative Planning by George Ferguson and James F. Allen and Rationale-supported Mixed-initiative Case-based Planning by Manuela M. Veloso, Alice M. Mulvehill and Michael T. Cox.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s